Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 16:42:04 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: hsu@clinet.fi Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: kern/600: PPP does not pay attention to IPTOS_LOWDELAY Message-ID: <199507081442.QAA21479@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199507080000.RAA29882@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Heikki Suonsivu" at Jul 7, 95 05:00:02 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Heikki Suonsivu wrote: > > if (INTERACTIVE(p & 0xffff) || INTERACTIVE(p >> 16)) > ifq = &sc->sc_fastq; > } > + > + /* > + * Most high-priority services set IPTOS_LOWDELAY. This is a much more > + * generic mechanism than specific port numbers. This same mechanism > + * is used by slip. > + */ > + if (ip->ip_tos & IPTOS_LOWDELAY) > + ifq = &sc->sc_fastq; > + About to commit it. Btw., the ``interactive'' hack has been removed from if_sl.c in 4.4BSD. Is this a good or a bad thing? Who's actually setting IPTOS_LOWDELAY? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507081442.QAA21479>