Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:13:31 +0200
From:      Michal Vanco <vanco@satro.sk>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Sten Daniel =?iso-8859-1?q?S=F8rsdal?= <lists@wm-access.no>
Subject:   Re: Routes not deleted after link down
Message-ID:  <200506201113.34307.vanco@satro.sk>
In-Reply-To: <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no>
References:  <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
> > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.
> >
> > What is opinion of other networkers?
>
> How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event
> and disabling of the route? Then even people with roaming wlan cards can
> benefit.
> Also it is in my opinion that the route be disabled (moved to a passive
> route table maybe?) and not deleted.

This is what I meant initially. Marking route passive is better than just=20
deleting it and it'll be also faster to recall the route back in case of li=
nk=20
up.

--nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCtoi+2/VqJwUsLAMRAkV7AJ9k4+qUBriivsLdaNcjSo3RHtA3LQCgmgEG
hm+IhTO2UeeDrVeR6401neE=
=s+kG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506201113.34307.vanco>