Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:53:44 -0400 From: "David Hoffman" <zionicman@gmail.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-user-groups@freebsd.org, freebsd-misc@freebsd.org, Brett <thisdayislong@gmail.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, Ingrid Kast Fuller <ingrid@cityscope.net>, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post Message-ID: <e8b564e30606192353s7769dc40i12e634fd4c54695a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86bqspwkiv.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <e8b564e30606181741u1a2e966fw513d49fadc369935@mail.gmail.com> <200606190054.k5J0sm0V014234@ns1.cityscope.net> <f5b151550606181800y57a4fc9fo72f055c3a54e29b8@mail.gmail.com> <e8b564e30606181805n509594ayfc233de5a039521d@mail.gmail.com> <86bqspwkiv.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Please note that they modified the page several times while I was involved in this discussion. That specific comment was about an old revision. However, the current version of the site still has a problem: while the HouFUG copyright notice could be in reference to the page and not the article, the notice doesn't make that at all clear. This should be changed= . On 6/19/06, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > > "David Hoffman" <zionicman@gmail.com> writes: > > It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is > publishing. They've > > now noted on their site that it was written by you. However, they STIL= L > > claim they own the copyright. > > No, they claim a copyright for their site, which is perfectly valid - > look up "compilation copyright" in your favorite search engine. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e8b564e30606192353s7769dc40i12e634fd4c54695a>