Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:50:39 +0100 From: Chris Stenton <jacs@gnome.co.uk> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin Message-ID: <1066164638.6688.5.camel@hawk.gnome.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20031014115902.GA25582@rfc-networks.ie> References: <20031012123823.M25378@littlejack.nl> <200310121213.34769.wes@softweyr.com> <1066043654.51363.0.camel@hawk.gnome.co.uk> <20031014115902.GA25582@rfc-networks.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 12:59, Philip Reynolds wrote: > Chris Stenton <jacs@gnome.co.uk> 25 lines of wisdom included: > > I would second this but I use mailscanner which does the same job. > > Mailscanner seems like a very poorly designed piece of software, at > least from my experience with Postfix. > > It directly manipulates the Postfix queue which can cause message > corruption. This has been raised on the Postfix list recently and > since Wietse & co. have been advising _against_ using it with > Postfix. > > Just an FYI. Interesting. I still use sendmail (with check_local) and it seems OK with that but it is setup to use an in and out queue. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1066164638.6688.5.camel>