Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 18:12:28 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive on as default ? Message-ID: <4586.928512748@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Jun 1999 17:06:54 BST." <19990604170654.A8800@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990604170654.A8800@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, David Malone writes: >It might be nice to have two keepalive timeouts like Nate suggested. >You'd have a short one, which applies if the application turns on >keepalive or you have alwayskeepalive on. Then you'd have a long >one, which applies to all connections regardless. Then: Then you might as well implement per socket adjustable keepalives. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4586.928512748>