Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 11:10:26 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 ng_pptpgre.4 Message-ID: <20020317111026.A91596@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20020316163707.A54661@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200203161756.g2GHufn20522@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020317103642.E61310@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020316163707.A54661@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 16 March 2002 at 16:37:07 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 10:36:42AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: >> On Saturday, 16 March 2002 at 9:56:41 -0800, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: >>> schweikh 2002/03/16 09:56:41 PST >>> >>> Modified files: >>> share/man/man4 ng_pptpgre.4 >>> Log: >>> Typo: s/acknowlegement/acknowledgement/ >> >> Why? s/acknowledgement/acknowledgment/ >> >> ispell is your friend. >> > > Both acknowledgement and acknowledgment are acceptable spelling > according to Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, only acknowledgment is correct. ispell agrees, and my Webster's "New" Encyclopedic Dictionary prefers it. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020317111026.A91596>