Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:07:10 +0100 From: mouss <usebsd@free.fr> To: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET>, "David G. Andersen" <dga@pobox.com> Cc: FreeBSD-SECURITY <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: [spam score 10.00/10.0 -pobox] Re: Fw: NAPTHA Advisory Updated - BindView RAZOR Message-ID: <4.3.0.20001206150604.05998d30@pop.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012042134110.69763-100000@epsilon.lucida.ca > References: <200012050138.SAA03007@faith.cs.utah.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 21:39 04/12/00 -0500, Matt Heckaman wrote:
>It would be nice if one could set login.conf(5) style resource limits per
>daemon instead of per login. Thus we could say, well "{q,send}mail can
>have 1024 fds" while apache can have 4096.. etc. Maybe there is a way to
>do this (djb's tcpserver? xinetd?) but I'm not currently aware of one.
isn't enough to create an account for each server or group of servers,
and use login.conf for the users?
>One thing though, it would be nice to see FreeBSD's default fd &
>nmbcluster setting be raised, as it really isn't going to be enough for a
>lot of people in normal use, and damn sure won't stand up to any kind of
>attack like this. Just an opinion though :)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.0.20001206150604.05998d30>