Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:18:34 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: old style kernel configuration Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=oFTNDpA0MK4npHhtNjV19H9jXLJhWmAwQW6zg8zRYZA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211231847520.1423@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAF6rxgmxiaA1twJf%2BKMv=ZpxCWp1MdL5GEEEFLwBuRqcGpctdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGH67wRFvzKhSwyTA_2R0WCHaPFNXEvh4nEdoF5pbtAfJSGwKw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211231847520.1423@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 November 2012 12:48, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: >> >> For new/non-advanced users, this shouldn't necessarily be exposed >> except as an implementation detail and a historical artifact; more Lets kill this thread now. I have the answers to - should we keep the documentation and - what are the man differences between the old and new ways. and it is starting to turn into a flame/bikeshed. Thanks for the information. I'll restore the documentation with updated information shortly. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=oFTNDpA0MK4npHhtNjV19H9jXLJhWmAwQW6zg8zRYZA>