Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:15:31 +0000 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmanager confusion Message-ID: <200603132015.36720.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <17428.56461.451976.293083@roam.psg.com> References: <17428.48090.416936.142264@roam.psg.com> <200603122035.10272.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> <17428.56461.451976.293083@roam.psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 13 March 2006 02:44, Randy Bush wrote: > >> two questions > >> > >> o how do i tell portmanager to force the single port, and > >> not everything on which it depends as in -f? > >> > >> o why did portmanager not rebuild in the following case. > >> as i can not force, then who is responsible to see ports > > > > with changes are rebuilt? > > > > Take a look at the acroread Makefile and you'll see why you can't do > > anything with it. > > ok, so i am in the midst of the disgusting incantations for acroread. > This is a red-herring, all you need do is agree to the terms when prompted.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603132015.36720.list-freebsd-2004>