Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:48:43 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/groff/tmac tmac.doc Message-ID: <35092.979548523@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:44:53 %2B0200." <20010115104453.B13717@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:44:53 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Vt is effectively equivalent to the Ft (it even uses the same font), so > it is not really of any preference over Ft, just use Ft where you would > use Vt. Even where the type isn't used as a function return type in any of the code described (or even any of the code)? I'm happy with whatever is decided, so long as our poor developers can settle on a standard mark-up for variable types. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35092.979548523>