Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 02:12:17 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org Subject: [pf4freebsd] Re: RELENG_5 and carp patches - Status Message-ID: <200409160212.18558.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <4148D802.9020206@authtec.net> References: <41476126.7000503@dequim.ist.utl.pt> <200409160156.18049.max@love2party.net> <4148D802.9020206@authtec.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart15427356.eH5r1L2iq7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 16 September 2004 02:02, sam wrote: > >Ugh ... this got completely forgotten. Check the patch at: > >http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/ifconfig.pfsync.patch (hope it still > >applies) it will certainly cause rejects with the carp-ifconfig ... > > This patch looks quite old compared to the one released in Aug. > Can I only use the patches in Aug? Where do you get this from? There is - to my knowledge - only one patch for= =20 ifconfig + pfsync and that is the one linked above. As all the magic is in= =20 the new file there should not be much problem in resolving the conflicts. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart15427356.eH5r1L2iq7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBSNpiXyyEoT62BG0RAvqZAJwNwBlnRGW5hfnZnjwxNJCQ0xf7KQCdEiQn PiXslC2KGi/QN+tawgjlAzU= =1mtq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart15427356.eH5r1L2iq7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409160212.18558.max>