Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:41:48 +0900 From: ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPsec performance (Re: Merge of KAME code) Message-ID: <20000718164148U.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20000716174745.A19964@clickarray.com> References: <20000716174745.A19964@clickarray.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:47:45 -0700,
Steve Shah <sshah@clickarray.com> wrote,
: > : > TCP STREAM TEST UDP STREAM TEST
: > : > NONE: 60Mbps NONE: 94Mbps
: > : > AH: 23Mbps AH: 30Mbps
: > : > ESP: 11Mbps ESP: 11Mbps
: > : > AH+ESP: 8Mbps AH+ESP: 9Mbps
: What was the speed of the processor that this test was run under?
Hi, as I wrote in <20000713032922M.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp>,
there were three actors.
HOST - ROUTER - HOST
Router didn't do any IPsec.
HOST specification was,
- PentiumII 450MHz
- 128MB Memory
- Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps)
- FreeBSD 2.2.8
- KAME 19990809 stable
ROUTER specification was,
- PentiumIII 500MHz
- 256MB Memory
- Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps)
- FreeBSD 2.2.8
- KAME 19990809 stable
Regards,
// ARIGA Seiji
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000718164148U.say>