Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:41:48 +0900
From:      ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPsec performance (Re: Merge of KAME code)
Message-ID:  <20000718164148U.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20000716174745.A19964@clickarray.com>
References:  <20000716174745.A19964@clickarray.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:47:45 -0700,
Steve Shah <sshah@clickarray.com> wrote,

: > : >   TCP STREAM TEST   UDP STREAM TEST
: > : >     NONE:   60Mbps    NONE:   94Mbps
: > : >     AH:     23Mbps    AH:     30Mbps
: > : >     ESP:    11Mbps    ESP:    11Mbps
: > : >     AH+ESP:  8Mbps    AH+ESP:  9Mbps
: What was the speed of the processor that this test was run under?

Hi, as I wrote in <20000713032922M.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp>,
there were three actors.

HOST - ROUTER - HOST

Router didn't do any IPsec.

HOST specification was,
    - PentiumII 450MHz
    - 128MB Memory
    - Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps)
    - FreeBSD 2.2.8
    - KAME 19990809 stable

ROUTER specification was,
    - PentiumIII 500MHz
    - 256MB Memory
    - Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps)
    - FreeBSD 2.2.8
    - KAME 19990809 stable

Regards,

// ARIGA Seiji


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000718164148U.say>