Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:54:55 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/lsh Makefile ports/security/lsh/files patch-nettle-openssl.c Message-ID: <1155419695.12089.0.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <44DE4C6F.4040707@FreeBSD.org> References: <200608122126.k7CLQ7qN091943@repoman.freebsd.org> <44DE4C6F.4040707@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Gábor Kövesdán píše v so 12. 08. 2006 v 23:47 +0200:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > pav 2006-08-12 21:26:07 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > security/lsh Makefile
> > Added files:
> > security/lsh/files patch-nettle-openssl.c
> > Log:
> > - Fix build on 4.X
> > - Respect CC and CFLAGS
> >
> > PR: ports/101750
> > Submitted by: Babak Farrokhi <babak@farrokhi.net> (maintainer)
> >
> > Revision Changes Path
> > 1.35 +2 -0 ports/security/lsh/Makefile
> > 1.1 +10 -0 ports/security/lsh/files/patch-nettle-openssl.c (new)
> I think it also needs a PORTREVISION bump if you make a port respect CC
> since such change affects the build phase of the port.
Imagine you are user with already installed lsh; do you want to
recompile just because of this change?
Imagine you are user who downloads the package from the ftp site.
Do you mind you don't have this change?
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Can't sing. Can't dance. Can handle a sword a little.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBE3k4vntdYP8FOsoIRAjiQAKDIJdCAW0DXnfLEWd8FWx0/DvgZWwCfQzp7
+kUcrZTTzQPCxdEVvGETKxs=
=DXj/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1155419695.12089.0.camel>