Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 17:11:14 +0200 (MET DST) From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no> To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: doc-all collection? Message-ID: <199710141511.RAA15830@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: John Fieber's message of Sun, 12 Oct 1997 17:49:16 -0500 (EST) References: <199710122035.VAA03569@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971012173830.4546O-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> Unlike man pages which are intimately tied to specific pieces of > code in FreeBSD, the FAQ and Handbook cut across versions and > having 3 separate versions on 3 separate CVS branches was nothing > more than a large headache. They also required bringing in extra > bloat (sgml tools) to the source tree and binary core binary > distributions. I considered the removal of the SGML tools a pity - I'd have liked to be able to write man-pages in a more powerful form of markup later, e.g. DocBook. That way, integration between man-pages and the handbook would probably be easier. We can probably cross that bridge when we come to it, though. Eivind.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710141511.RAA15830>