Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:59:53 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Jun Su <junsu@delphij.net> Subject: Re: [patch] bug in cpp's #ident handling in gcc 3.4 [Was: ccache with buildworld] Message-ID: <412E1709.7010706@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040826164212.GA62037@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <412DF886.4030107@portaone.com> <412E0243.1050808@delphij.net> <412E0B6C.8030001@portaone.com> <20040826164212.GA62037@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 07:10:20PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>Pointless. Instead of fixing the problem we will remove condition when >>this problem evidences itself. I am not advocating about keeping #ident, >>since it is completely orthogonal question. gcc claims that it supports >>#ident, there are problems in this support - they have to be fixed. >> >>Remember, there are lot of software out of /usr/src over which we have >>no control (e.g. /usr/ports), so that removing #ident will really be >>only half-measure, especially considering that the patch is readily >>available. >> >>-Maxim >> > > > Isn't src/contrib/gcc/c-ppoutput.c on the vendor branch? > Have you sent your patch to GCC? I wonder if it would be better if kan will do it, since he obviously knows better inner circles of gcc team. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?412E1709.7010706>