Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Aug 2020 15:30:18 +0200
From:      Peter Libassi <peter@libassi.se>
To:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru>
Cc:        net <net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ip(8) in base
Message-ID:  <3FFD7C38-8B9B-4A91-BFA9-79B4D639782F@libassi.se>
In-Reply-To: <1634721597568903@mail.yandex.ru>
References:  <1634721597568903@mail.yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

From a consumer view I think we should be conservative and not add any additional commands that operates in an area where there already exists well known commands. Not sure i understand what new features you are contributing, but the sound of it i guess it has to do with IP routing and fib’s. If this is the case i would like to see this introduced in to route(8) and netstat(1)

/Peter

> 16 aug. 2020 kl. 11:11 skrev Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@ipfw.ru>:
> 
> I want to introduce ip(8) or something similar in base.
> Basically, I need some userland tool to explicitly operates on nexthops, nexthop groups and fib lookup algorithms.
> 
> The existing tools are not well suited for the job: route(8) may be a candidate, but (a) it would either add another bunch of  options or drastically change the tool by introducing [route nhop add], [route nhgroup add] and (b) listing is traditionally done by netstat(8).
> 
> I feel like there is a need of some cli tool that provides the ability to easily extend it by having separate namespaces for each sub-command (hello, ifconfig).
> 
> Naming is hard. I can, for example, use "rt" as a name to address my use cases.
> However, given the kernel interfaces for managing nexthops/nexhop groups are the same as with routes/arp/ndp, why not spending some additional time and support operating on routes and neighbors and name it ip?
> 
> Though, that arises multiple questions.
> Are we comfortable with ip(8) as a name in general?
> If we are, what’s our take on having the compatible interface with Linux ip(8)? 
> 
> Any comments/feedback is welcome :-)
> 
> 
> Appendix 
> List of commands I need implemented
> 
> cmd [-46m] nhop create [gw XX] [iface YYY] [mtu YYY] [reject] [proxyfib Y] [fib X][ipv4] [ipv6]
> cmd [-46m] nhop delete nhop_id
> cmd -46m nhop list 
> cmd -j nhop list # json 
> 
> cmd -46m nhgroup create nhops 1,2,3,4,5,6 [fib X]
> cmd -46 nhgroup create nhops 1=100,2=100,3=200,4=100 [proxyfib Y][fib X]
> cmd -46 nhroup list
> cmd -46 nhgroup delete nhgroup_id
> 
> cmd -46 fib algo list
> cmd -46 fib algo set algo dpdk_lpm6 fib 0
> cmd -46 fib algo set algo auto fib 0
> 
> 
> /Alexander
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FFD7C38-8B9B-4A91-BFA9-79B4D639782F>