Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 10:54:10 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@FreeBSD.org> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure Message-ID: <199609040854.KAA00846@vector.jhs.no_domain> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Sep 1996 06:56:44 CDT." <v02140b03ae51c338e0fc@[208.2.87.4]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Reference: > From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) > Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 06:56:44 -0500 > Message-id: <v02140b03ae51c338e0fc@[208.2.87.4]> > > dropped. CVSup of the total tree is appropriate for the "bleeding > edger's". But CVSup is not the only appropriate solution ... We've had developers who produced useful code but were doomed to bad coms links. CTM is asynchronous to net disturbances, so ideal for those with poor net access, whereas cvsup requires a net in good condition. Julian -- Julian H. Stacey jhs@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609040854.KAA00846>