Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Jul 1996 22:02:21 -0400
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To:        delerium@eagle.ais.net
Cc:        walter@biostat.sph.unc.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SIG's 11 and 6...
Message-ID:  <199607030202.WAA07812@kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <m0ubGRb-000VyVC@eagle.ais.net> (delerium@eagle.ais.net)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
HUMAN REPLICAS are inserted into VATS of NUTRITIONAL YEAST...

  > I wonder if my problem is actually heat-related as well?  Reducing
  > the CPU clock may simply cause the chip to run cooler.  Anyone
  > else have similar troubles, or other ideas?

It is the case that reducing the clock causes the chip to run cooler.
In fact, the way that Intel (and others) decide on the speed of a
given chip is by clocking one in the batch higher and higher until it
fries, drop that speed by x%, and stamp it on.

-- 
http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu

Fourth law of computing:
  Anything that can go wro
.signature: segmentation violation -- core dumped



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607030202.WAA07812>