Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 13:08:31 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: obrien@NUXI.com, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Chris Csanady <cc@137.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Wiring down disks under newbus (was: HEADS UP!!!! Important instructions for -current users!) Message-ID: <19990417130831.D27806@lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <19990416200608.A70132@nuxi.com>; from David O'Brien on Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 08:06:08PM -0700 References: <19990417004932.9B981121@friley-185-205.res.iastate.edu> <19990417005827.D38BA1F69@spinner.netplex.com.au> <19990416200608.A70132@nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 16 April 1999 at 20:06:08 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: >>> device da0 > ..snip.. >>> disk da0 at scbus2 target 0 > >> Err, perhaps it's because you've defined da0 twice? > > Is this a change? For pre-POST_NEWBUS When wireing down SCSI disks, the > config file has both a da0 device (to get the generic SCSI disk code) and > disk (to wire it down). It doesn't have to. I have only one reference in my config: device da0 at scbus1 target 0 unit 0 So what's the difference in semantics between a 'device' entry and a 'disk' entry? Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990417130831.D27806>