Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Aug 2022 06:42:06 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 243299] fetch(1) fails to handle redirects on a valid URL
Message-ID:  <bug-243299-227-0EVaoG61VH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-243299-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-243299-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243299

pprocacci@gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pprocacci@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from pprocacci@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 236031
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D236031&action=
=3Dedit
Add support for relative urls in redirect responses

RFC 7231 has support for relative urls.
I saw this bug report and had to check.  I didn't believe it.

The attach patch fixes the op's issue, but truly it needs to be tested with=
 all
kinds of responses.

Additionally, I program in C in a much much different way than the source
file's layout.  Safe to apply, sure, but it'd be wise for someone else to g=
ive
it a once over to ensure it conforms to your standards; something someone e=
lse
can do if they so choose.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243299-227-0EVaoG61VH>