Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:00:16 +0200
From:      Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 5b7c17856512 - main - git hooks: Rework authorship instructions.
Message-ID:  <B6C4775F-8A8F-401B-AA2D-6913EC6BA782@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210422104914.d3kwtrwl2jovwvu2@aching.in.mat.cc>
References:  <20210422104914.d3kwtrwl2jovwvu2@aching.in.mat.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 22. Apr 2021, at 12:49, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFOn Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:43:46AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:=

>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:10:26PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> I agree that author should only be used if a submission is applied
>>>> unaltered (pull request/git patch).
>>>=20
>>> Submitted by has always been for submission that was unaltered (or only
>>> slightly altered) if it was only the basis of the work, then "submitted
>>> by" is not to be used, in those cases, reported by is the correct
>>> choice.
>>=20
>> Not really, no.  "PR:/Submitted by:" is canonical combination, yet most
>> of us modify submitted patches because they almost always need more work.=

>=20
> Then you are misusing Submitted by.  Submitted by was supposed to be
> used when you committed something that was, well, submitted by someone
> else.  If the work is yours, and that you based your work on someone
> else's, then, it is not submitted by them.
>=20

I don=E2=80=99t think git author should be used if anything is altered, incl=
uding the commit message (as a contributor, I wouldn=E2=80=99t want to give a=
nyone the impression that the rude ramblings of a grumpy committer are to be=
 attributed to me). That doesn=E2=80=99t map well to our model though. I ass=
ume the git working group discussed this in detail, especially when it comes=
 to accepting pull requests over various channels.

-m


> --=20
> Mathieu Arnold




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B6C4775F-8A8F-401B-AA2D-6913EC6BA782>