Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 20:51:44 +0100 From: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: incremental bulds from scratch with beinstall.sh Message-ID: <CAFDf7UJ%2BfOiE=THP83KG1MYqy7WNaKp1rAxfwCLVgKMK2SGM3A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86E414BD-6FA1-4B46-B0FE-DEABCED63DC5@yahoo.com> References: <28F2BDE7-5903-4C04-A570-6A407F19D5F2@yahoo.com> <CAFDf7ULuKpL_zxWKUkPCoHeQf-=YHdM=w43HBP7buinzJoh0Pw@mail.gmail.com> <5BFEF4D2-0E42-46ED-899B-D27169DFC322@yahoo.com> <CAFDf7UJHy93oWCgbr1aTqfKS8-S-C-TXTa4Bvuto2gXAmPPGEQ@mail.gmail.com> <86E414BD-6FA1-4B46-B0FE-DEABCED63DC5@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Same context of WITH_META_MODE, it will speed up for sure my builds, tunning what parts/targets of llvm will be built: > WITH_LLVM_TARGET_AARCH64= > WITH_LLVM_TARGET_ARM= > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_MIPS= > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_POWERPC= > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_RISCV= > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_X86= > I will use instead the bellow: > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_ALL= > and check for results, plus WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL= for extra tunning. > > May be I've guess wrong about what you mean by "clean > > /usr/obj"? > When I did say it I was talking about plain builds after `rm -fr /usr/obj/*`, but it is out of context anyway. The context is METAMODE. Other thing, I'm wandering how DIRDEPS will perform over METAMODE when we do a buildworld/buildkernel with same src/obj on a new BE. First I will do the llvm tunning and one of these days I will try DIRDEPS and see how it goes. Thanks! [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div>Same context of WITH_META_MODE, it will speed up for sure my builds, tunning what parts/targets of llvm will be built:</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> WITH_LLVM_TARGET_AARCH64=<br> WITH_LLVM_TARGET_ARM=<br> WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_MIPS=<br> WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_POWERPC=<br> WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_RISCV=<br> WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_X86=<br></blockquote><div><br>I will use instead the bellow: <br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_ALL=<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>and check for results, plus</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL=</blockquote><div><br></div><div>for extra tunning.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> May be I've guess wrong about what you mean by "clean<br> > /usr/obj"?<br> </blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>When I did say it I was talking about plain builds after `rm -fr /usr/obj/*`, but it is out of context anyway. The context is METAMODE.<br><br></div><div>Other thing, I'm wandering how DIRDEPS will perform over METAMODE when we do a buildworld/buildkernel with same src/obj on a new BE.<br></div><div>First I will do the llvm tunning and one of these days I will try DIRDEPS and see how it goes.<br><br></div><div>Thanks!</div></div>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFDf7UJ%2BfOiE=THP83KG1MYqy7WNaKp1rAxfwCLVgKMK2SGM3A>