Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:26:31 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Daniel Lannstrom <op@trekdanne.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root shell Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903011925550.43128@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090301155532.GA29514@haruhi> References: <d2f26f270903010650h243df36bx2ea07d434567633e@mail.gmail.com> <20090301155532.GA29514@haruhi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Why is this not a good idea? The only reason I can think of it that you > want your root shell on the root hard drive. As many system use a > separate partition for /usr and that bash installs to /usr/local/bin per yes it may be a reason, but there is always /rescue directory. and - at least me - prefer to have as little partition as possible to not make things complicated. most cases swap+/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903011925550.43128>