Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:47:46 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu> To: Erich Dollansky <erich@alogreentechnologies.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One or Four? Message-ID: <20120220144746.GA40329@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <201202191055.02035.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> References: <4F3ECF23.5000706@fisglobal.com> <201202190803.39548.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <20120219023055.GA34544@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <201202191055.02035.erich@alogreentechnologies.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:55:01AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > > Nor does it prevent any of the schemes people have been advocating or > > > > requesting. > > > > > > You seem to forget normal users who just want to use the system. > > > They do not think of recovery until it actually happens. > > > > We forgot nothing. They can just select option 1 and then later > > when something happens so learn otherwise, if they ever do, they > > will have option 3 to more specifically build their system according > > to their newly perceived needs. > > where do they get the knowledge from? Same as always throughout history - from experience. They can use the default until they discover what suits them better. ////jerry > > Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120220144746.GA40329>