Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 14:11:16 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: potentially simpler approach than scheduler activations. Message-ID: <20001118141116.E70679@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20001117094543.A76006@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 09:45:43AM -0800 References: <20001116140506.Q830@fw.wintelcom.net> <14868.39578.928654.157924@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20001117094543.A76006@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 17 November 2000 at 9:45:43 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >>> I know that by applying these band-aids we aren't completely >>> solving every problem and as new interfaces pop-up we might >>> have to apply more band-aids to libc_r, but I think this >>> might get us past the point of system that breaks down on >>> disk IO. >> >> This sounds like a really good idea to me, as long as it is qualified >> as an interum solution until KSE is ready and not a competitor to it. > > Also KSE's will never be back ported to RELENG_4. Maybe some of these > ideas can be. I see this as diluting the effort. Once we have a bandaid, we'll be less concerned about doing the right thing. And deliberately introducing different semantics in RELENG_4 seems not to be the Right Thing To Do. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001118141116.E70679>