Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:03:26 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: "S.N.Grigoriev" <serguey-grigoriev@yandex.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn Message-ID: <CAHHBGkpeyfbkDG-=x_6pMKkL-16=r94wg%2BQFSRXMj7ESzAwQKg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 December 2012 09:39, S.N.Grigoriev <serguey-grigoriev@yandex.ru> wrote: > Hi list, > > after the security announcement (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes when using svn? > make index does take a good 20 minutes on a dual core machine, but it's not strictly needed, as pkg_version -vl"<" (or pkg version -vl"<" if you're using the new pkg system) work well, albeit more slowly than if they had an index (as in pkg_version -vIl"<") portmaster doesn't require an index to update stuff. I can't remember if portupgrade does. The index can be [re]built at your leisure while other things are going on (such as rebuilding out-of-date ports), if you don't mind the additional CPU & IO load. -- --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHHBGkpeyfbkDG-=x_6pMKkL-16=r94wg%2BQFSRXMj7ESzAwQKg>