Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:27:43 -0500
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Alan Cox <alc@freebsd.org>, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com>, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}
Message-ID:  <201111301827.46079.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201111301807.21351.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> <4ED6AEFE.4010106@FreeBSD.org> <201111301807.21351.jkim@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
> > > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here.
> > > Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself.
> >
> > on 27/11/2011 19:09 Alan Cox said the following:
> > > vm_page_alloc_contig() should be used instead.
> >
> > My take on the patch:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/vbox-10.patch
> > This is for head only, no check for FreeBSD version.
>
> Actually, I did the same thing last night:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-Runtime-r0drv-freebs
>d-memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c
>
> This is a drop-in replacement for the patch.  The only practical
> difference I see from yours is I used VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT instead of
> VM_ALLOC_NORMAL.  I believe this function may be used in interrupt
> context.  FYI, I tried FreeBSD 9 and Fedora 10 without problem.

BTW, I needed another patch to build virtual-ose-kmod on head:

http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-HostDrivers-Support-freebsd-SUPDrv-freebsd.c

FYI...

Jung-uk Kim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201111301827.46079.jkim>