Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:15:15 -0500 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: kris@obsecurity.org, postmaster@FreeBSD.org, Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/linux-nwserver Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <40161E13.30258.5400F36@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200401270451.i0R4pn7E079593@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <20040127022859.GA50817@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 Jan 2004 at 20:51, Don Lewis wrote: > On 26 Jan, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:14:30PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > >> FreshPorts noted that this message (and two others) did not have a > >> Message-Id field. > > > > Note also the date..a mail system is regurgitating old messages. > > Judging by the Received: headers, it appears to be the hub.FreeBSD.org > mail servers. Some of the regurgitated messages that I've seen were > either sent by me or were parts of threads that I followed, and of the > ones that I checked, I did not receive the message when it was first > sent. It looks like at least some of these messages got stuck in the > queue and just now got unstuck. > > Here are the relevant Received: headers from one of the messages I sent > several weeks ago and didn't receive until just a little while ago: > > Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0R2Tw7D079431 for <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:29:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) > Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02724579B7; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:29:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) > Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA28A16A4E9; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:29:53 -0800 (PST) > Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F2016A4CE for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:35:00 -0800 (PST) > Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174B843D49 for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:34:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) >From the FreshPorts database, I count 66 messages which were received on 26 Jan for commits between 2003-10-21 03:34:15-07 and 2003-12-23 12:35:08-08. There are not duplicated messages (i.e. the Message-ID fields were not already in FreshPorts). These messages where caught up somewhere. For details of these commits, see http://www.freshports.org/tmp/delayed-commits.2004.01.16.html For those using the FreshPorts notification service, these commits will be appearing in your next notification message. For notifications, FreshPorts has always worked off the date a commit is added to the database and not the commit date. This strategy was chosen to cater for the situation described above. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40161E13.30258.5400F36>