Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:31:40 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Stanley Hopcroft <Stanley.Hopcroft@IPAustralia.gov.au> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSH and/or Kerberos experience Message-ID: <2323.993202300@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:00:35 %2B1000." <20010622100034.B788@IPAustralia.Gov.AU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:00:35 +1000, Stanley Hopcroft wrote: > The main difference I see between Kerberos and SSH is that Kerberos > provides a single point of control for the authentication process: > rights can be added or deleted in only one place. Use both, in other words, Kerberized SSH. Kerberos scores you ticket-based authentication, while SSH scores you an encrypted session. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2323.993202300>