Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:19:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vladimir N.Silyaev" <vns@mindspring.com> To: bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridged networking with vmware Message-ID: <200008010019.UAA00641@jupiter.delta.ny.us> In-Reply-To: <200007312111.RAA00472@pobox.engeast.BayNetworks.COM> References: <200007312111.RAA00472@pobox.engeast.BayNetworks.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:11:10 -0400, Robert Withrow <bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com> wrote: >In what port does vmnet_bridge.ko exist? It was existed in beta version, announce about beta testing was postet to this list couple weeks ago. >I'm running the "standard" FreeBSD port of VMWARE (/usr/ports/.../vmware1) >with the Makefile having version 1.19, and there doesn't seem to be >any vmnet_bridge.ko built. If you are have 4.1 system or latter, you are have just to start: sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge_refresh=1 sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge=1 If you are have errors on that way, you should build kernel with BRIDGE option. > >It is very confusing there being all these different ports. It's only two of them - one in FreeBSD port tree, and second one, for testing available from my page. > >Also, it would be a lot more *user friendly* if whatever ports there >are, that they all support 4.0 REL as well as newer stuff. It takes >us a while to qual new releases. 4.0-Release was just testing release, if I don't miss something. And bridge options will be not supported on it. -- Vladimir To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008010019.UAA00641>