Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:02:33 +0200
From:      Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 5b7c17856512 - main - git hooks: Rework authorship instructions.
Message-ID:  <6F9BF9EF-BA78-4E47-9A1C-3A022E2B6ED7@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <YIFWdO5pTJCu45qa@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <YIFWdO5pTJCu45qa@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 22. Apr 2021, at 12:57, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFOn Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:49:14PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:43:46AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:10:26PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> I agree that author should only be used if a submission is applied
>>>>> unaltered (pull request/git patch).
>>>>=20
>>>> Submitted by has always been for submission that was unaltered (or only=

>>>> slightly altered) if it was only the basis of the work, then "submitted=

>>>> by" is not to be used, in those cases, reported by is the correct
>>>> choice.
>>>=20
>>> Not really, no.  "PR:/Submitted by:" is canonical combination, yet most
>>> of us modify submitted patches because they almost always need more work=
.
>>=20
>> Then you are misusing Submitted by.  Submitted by was supposed to be
>> used when you committed something that was, well, submitted by someone
>> else.  If the work is yours, and that you based your work on someone
>> else's, then, it is not submitted by them.
>=20
> No: "submitted" literally means there was actionable submission, i.e.
> a patch.  It could be good enough to be committed as is (rarely), or
> require various amounts of polishing.  Regardless of its quality, it
> is still not merely a "report" as you would suggest.  "Reports" are
> sent by portscout or pkg-fallout.

Users also send bug reports. I agree that it=E2=80=99s good to distinguish b=
etween reporting ("it=E2=80=99s broken"), submitting a patch ("this fixed it=
 for me"), and accepting a patch unaltered ("this fixes it for everyone in a=
 clean way").

-m


>=20
> ./danfe




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6F9BF9EF-BA78-4E47-9A1C-3A022E2B6ED7>