Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 21:01:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276697] www/firefox: erratic U2F support Message-ID: <bug-276697-21738-t9qKhgpgL4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-276697-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-276697-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276697 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Christian Weisgerber from comment #2) > Does anybody use this productively? Good question - top of my head I remember very few (single-digits) sites offering full U2F, and those are really not my most-frequented ones. (I use= one of the blue Yubikeys from a few years back as my primary U2F-device). >I would love to ktrace a failure so see whether that provides any clue, bu= t how do I find out which Firefox process to trace? There's about:processes > (Meanwhile I use ssh with U2F a two-digit number of times every day and i= t works 100%.) Do matters improve when SSH is not accessing the key? I use "traditional" s= sh keys from the "auth" slots of some USB/smartcard fobs (the blue yubikey doe= sn't store keys, so...), so I can't have any conflict there. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-276697-21738-t9qKhgpgL4>