Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:19:44 +0000 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yesterday's -STABLE kernel corrupts LAN Message-ID: <200511262119.45582.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <4388AAB2.1010805@mainframe.ca> References: <20051126182651.A966@www.pukruppa.net> <4388A6E4.1040206@makeworld.com> <4388AAB2.1010805@mainframe.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 26 November 2005 18:34, Derrick MacPherson wrote: > Wow, if I could use that sarcasm to fuel my car I'd be happy. I guess we > would be the only people to run current or stable on a production > machine, and everyone else is using RELEASE? I guess I should have stuck > with 4.1x considering all the initial troubles with 5.x, and not go to 6 > at all cause Those of us who are content to drive the latest model, should be gratefull that there are people who volunteer to be crash-test dummies.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511262119.45582.list-freebsd-2004>