Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:37:24 -0400
From:      Vlad <marchenko@gmail.com>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de>
Subject:   Re: [BETA7-panic] sodealloc(): so_count 1
Message-ID:  <cd70c6810410110437736fae61@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041011040958.31040C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <20041010124058.58a03dba.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041011040958.31040C-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert,

this patch is a replacement (not addition) to what Brian came up with
before here
http://green.homeunix.org/~green/tcp_accept_race_crash.patch
correct?

I see they patch different files, so just making sure

thank you guys for your work and patience with the problem :)


On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 04:13:15 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson
<rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote:
> 
> > No, but I can revert the local patches, configure a dump device and try
> > getting one tomorrow or the day after that.
> 
> Marc,
> 
> Afer a couple of days of experimenting and chatting, Brian and I have
> developed what we hope is a less intrusive but fully functional fix for
> this problem.  I ran it through a barrage of tests yesterday, although I
> couldn't reproduce the problem originally, and the system still appears to
> run :-).  I've committed the patch to CVS HEAD (6.x), and will merge to
> 5.x in a few days, and assuming that your testing of the change doesn't
> reveal that it didn't fix the problem.  I have included a copy of the
> patch committed (minus $FreeBSD$ change) below.
> 
> If you could give this a spin, it would be much appreciated.  Thanks for
> your (and Vlad's) patience as we worked this out!  (And many thanks to
> Brian for doing so much of the work to fix it).
> 
> Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
> robert@fledge.watson.org      Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research
> 
> 
> Index: uipc_socket.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.212
> retrieving revision 1.213
> diff -u -r1.212 -r1.213
> --- uipc_socket.c       5 Sep 2004 14:33:21 -0000       1.212
> +++ uipc_socket.c       11 Oct 2004 08:11:26 -0000      1.213
> @@ -316,22 +316,34 @@
>        return (0);
> }
> 
> +/*
> + * Attempt to free a socket.  This should really be sotryfree().
> + *
> + * We free the socket if the protocol is no longer interested in the socket,
> + * there's no file descriptor reference, and the refcount is 0.  While the
> + * calling macro sotryfree() tests the refcount, sofree() has to test it
> + * again as it's possible to race with an accept()ing thread if the socket is
> + * in an listen queue of a listen socket, as being in the listen queue
> + * doesn't elevate the reference count.  sofree() acquires the accept mutex
> + * early for this test in order to avoid that race.
> + */
> void
> sofree(so)
>        struct socket *so;
> {
>        struct socket *head;
> 
> -       KASSERT(so->so_count == 0, ("socket %p so_count not 0", so));
> -       SOCK_LOCK_ASSERT(so);
> +       SOCK_UNLOCK(so);
> +       ACCEPT_LOCK();
> +       SOCK_LOCK(so);
> 
> -       if (so->so_pcb != NULL || (so->so_state & SS_NOFDREF) == 0) {
> +       if (so->so_pcb != NULL || (so->so_state & SS_NOFDREF) == 0 ||
> +           so->so_count != 0) {
>                SOCK_UNLOCK(so);
> +               ACCEPT_UNLOCK();
>                return;
>        }
> 
> -       SOCK_UNLOCK(so);
> -       ACCEPT_LOCK();
>        head = so->so_head;
>        if (head != NULL) {
>                KASSERT((so->so_qstate & SQ_COMP) != 0 ||
> @@ -353,6 +365,7 @@
>                 * the listening socket is closed.
>                 */
>                if ((so->so_qstate & SQ_COMP) != 0) {
> +                       SOCK_UNLOCK(so);
>                        ACCEPT_UNLOCK();
>                        return;
>                }
> @@ -365,6 +378,7 @@
>            (so->so_qstate & SQ_INCOMP) == 0,
>            ("sofree: so_head == NULL, but still SQ_COMP(%d) or SQ_INCOMP(%d)",
>            so->so_qstate & SQ_COMP, so->so_qstate & SQ_INCOMP));
> +       SOCK_UNLOCK(so);
>        ACCEPT_UNLOCK();
>        SOCKBUF_LOCK(&so->so_snd);
>        so->so_snd.sb_flags |= SB_NOINTR;
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 


-- 

Vlad



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cd70c6810410110437736fae61>