Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:14:30 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Message-ID: <3B55B5E6.7D3659BD@mindspring.com> References: <20010716013127.A16058@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010716103351.A81876@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <20010716031932.A5930@xor.obsecurity.org> <p05101004b77a150da1f1@[128.113.24.47]> <20010717094027.A78232@xor.obsecurity.org> <p05101007b77a2351f9de@[128.113.24.47]> <20010717102713.A79329@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010718002343.A30891@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > > Okay. So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be
> > > the API replacement for libreadline. Could we call that something
> > > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but
> > > leave libreadline as a separate port?
> >
> > How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some
> > makefile changes.
>
> I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
> 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)
The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here. I
could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES
in libcrypt.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B55B5E6.7D3659BD>