Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:22:02 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Matthew Jacob <lydianconcepts@gmail.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quirk for this? Message-ID: <45E3092A.5040404@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb0702252331m7d3a61c5u224d898b4f04248c@mail.gmail.com> References: <45DE6C64.8020400@samsco.org> <20070223.100839.112608684.imp@bsdimp.com> <7579f7fb0702231017rdc246ebqeface91c9d5481e3@mail.gmail.com> <20070225.230019.1649768891.imp@bsdimp.com> <7579f7fb0702252331m7d3a61c5u224d898b4f04248c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob wrote: >> >> I took a look at Linux, and they have a quirk for this. A bunch of >> cameras have this bug, as do iPods and a few media readers... >> > > So, is your take then we should have a "subtract by N" read capacity quirk? If it's just a USB property, I'd like to avoid adding a quirk to the CAM core, especially one that requires multiple arguments. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45E3092A.5040404>