Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:57:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 291413] www/apache24: 2.4.66 is available Message-ID: <bug-291413-16115-r69He4litC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-291413-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291413 John Marino <freebsd@marino.st> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsd@marino.st --- Comment #7 from John Marino <freebsd@marino.st> --- It was pointed out to me that this exact situation was anticipated by the porters handbook: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/makefiles/#makefile-automatic-dependencies So if anybody needs irrefutable proof that using the presence of local files to define library dependencies is wrong, now you have it. Can somebody in the apache group please revert this change? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-291413-16115-r69He4litC>