Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 17:09:22 +0100 From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: sommers@sfo.com Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Danger Ports Message-ID: <62270.975686962@verdi.nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Dec 2000 08:05:38 -0800" References: <5.0.0.25.2.20001201075130.085f1460@pop.sfo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> > > access-list 110 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any log > >> > > access-list 110 deny ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 any log > >> > >> > access-list 110 deny ip any 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 log > >> > access-list 110 deny ip any 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 log > >> > >> Is it me? Isn't the second network in each a subset of the first? > >> > > Now that I re-read your question, I see what you are saying...You are > > correct. > > Um, unless I'm not yet fully caffeinated: > > 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 matches 176.16.0.0 - 176.30.255.255 > 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 matches 176.31.0.0 - 176.31.255.255 You're not yet fully caffeinated. 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 matches 176.16.0.0 - 176.31.255.255 Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62270.975686962>