Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:08:09 +0000 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: <port> replacement Message-ID: <20020213230809.I92878@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <20020210100554.9A7DB3E35@bazooka.trit.org>; from dima@trit.org on Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 10:05:49AM %2B0000 References: <20020210100554.9A7DB3E35@bazooka.trit.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 10:05:49AM +0000, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> I propose to replace the <port> tag with <filename> and a "role"
> attribute as follows:
>
> <filename role="package">
1. Definitely 'package', not 'port'. Ports are just the infrastructure
that produce packages.
2. I have a nagging feeling that we should make sure the package's
category is included somewhere that DSSSL/XSLT stylesheets can
access it.
<filename role="package">net/cvsup</filename>
is less easy to parse (in a stylesheet) than something like
<filename role="package" category="net">cvsup</filename>
We can always make these entities, something like
&pkg.net.cvsup;
Hmm.
N
--
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ (__)
FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ \\\'',)
\/ \ ^
--- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- .\._/_)
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjxq8dgACgkQk6gHZCw343VWPACeNWlIwKevklijuO2MBjigkU2L
yjEAn3rQx3bOV9xW3cszPrcxdwwfs8Oz
=Zz6P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020213230809.I92878>