Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:38:54 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why 6.0-current? Message-ID: <20040820123854.GJ5433@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20040819185710.GA659@laptoxa.toxa.lan> References: <20040819185710.GA659@laptoxa.toxa.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:57:10PM +0400, Toxa wrote: > Recent buildkernel brigns me new os version: > > FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Aug 19 22:28:50 MSD 2004 > > I'm wondering, why HEAD tag is not 5.3-CURRENT? According to > development model, when 5.3-RELEASE will appear, HEAD should becomes 5.4-CURRENT, after 5.4-RELEASE it should bbecomes 5.5-CURRENT, etc... > Why 6.0? New development model? Would u mind to drop a link > describing this. With 5.3-RELEASE, RELENG_5 becomes -STABLE, and therefore 5.4-CURRENT will never exist; it will be 5.4-STABLE. HEAD is now 6.0-CURRENT. This has been the plan for quite some time. Ceri -- It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFBJfDeocfcwTS3JF8RAl5bAJ4oyupexv++0APmFEHc5egmEcCs1QCWNTcu 2OHBcM4XWsBrepE5z94wJg== =QcSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040820123854.GJ5433>