Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:45:10 -0400 From: Super Bisquit <superbisquit@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org> Cc: powerpc@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc Message-ID: <CA%2BWntOspd%2BOSxgPo7yRabKO2=hmV5cA_DE9jweoDGeJJSCX3SQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201203131532.q2DFWG2l057538@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> References: <201203131532.q2DFWG2l057538@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:32 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>wrote: > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - tinderbox 2.9 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for > powerpc/powerpc > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - cvsupping the source tree > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h > cvsup.sentex.ca /tinderbox/HEAD/powerpc/powerpc/supfile > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - building world > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - SRCCONF=/dev/null > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - TARGET=powerpc > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - TARGET_ARCH=powerpc > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - TZ=UTC > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - cd /src > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:59 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld > >>> World build started on Tue Mar 13 15:12:00 UTC 2012 > >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree > >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims > >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools > >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree > >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree > >>> stage 2.3: build tools > >>> stage 3: cross tools > >>> stage 4.1: building includes > >>> stage 4.2: building libraries > [...] > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2 -std=gnu99 > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/bzlib.c > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/blocksort.c > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/compress.c > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/crctable.c > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/decompress.c > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/huffman.c > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/randtable.c > cc -O2 -pipe -I/src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2 -std=gnu99 > -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/bzlib.c -o bzlib.o > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > In file included from /obj/powerpc.powerpc/src/tmp/usr/include/ctype.h:83, > from > /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/bzlib_private.h:29, > from /src/lib/libbz2/../../contrib/bzip2/bzlib.c:34: > /obj/powerpc.powerpc/src/tmp/usr/include/xlocale/_ctype.h:93: warning: no > previous prototype for '__sbmaskrune_l' > /obj/powerpc.powerpc/src/tmp/usr/include/xlocale/_ctype.h:102: warning: no > previous prototype for '__sbistype_l' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /src/lib/libbz2. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /src. > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:32:16 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:32:16 - ERROR: failed to build world > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:32:16 - 959.02 user 176.75 system 1229.77 real > > > http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-head-HEAD-powerpc-powerpc.full > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ppc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Again, the old questions: Why isn't a build world done on native architecture? Why is it never asked, "Could/would someone submit a build world log to be compared to the output of tinderbox for your architecture?" Considering that the POWER(PC) architecture is everywhere- at least in consoles, why isn't there more interest?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BWntOspd%2BOSxgPo7yRabKO2=hmV5cA_DE9jweoDGeJJSCX3SQ>