Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:04 GMT From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/170946: [patch] mark certain ports broken on ARM Message-ID: <201208251840.q7PIe4cs050637@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/170946; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> Cc: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>, dougb@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/170946: [patch] mark certain ports broken on ARM Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 13:32:51 -0500 On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:06:11PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > Also, don't forget that package building runs are often done with > TRY_BROKEN, which is very helpful when doing !intel builds. Well, I wouldn't say "often" :-) But yes, this is the distinction: whether or not we should even try to build it on the cluster in any circumstances. (e.g. if it has not yet been ported to that architecture, ONLY_FOR is the right thing AFAIC.) The errorlog URLs that I should have included (note that they are a bit disjoint): http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/arm-errorlogs/e.9.20120812031641.pointyhat-west/index-category.html http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/arm-errorlogs/e.9.20120818210612.pointyhat-west/index-category.html Finally, I wanted to use this PR as kind of a heads-up to maintainers that we had a new architecture up and going, so as to reduce the surprise. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201208251840.q7PIe4cs050637>