Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 11:10:59 -0600 From: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@iteration.net> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umount -f busted Message-ID: <20001108111059.A74554@peorth.iteration.net> In-Reply-To: <200011081443.HAA29725@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 07:43:24AM -0700 References: <200011081104.MAA84655@numeri.campus.luth.se> <200011081443.HAA29725@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 07:43:24AM -0700, Warner Losh scribbled: | In message <200011081104.MAA84655@numeri.campus.luth.se> Johan Karlsson writes: | : At Tue, 07 Nov 2000 14:54:50 MST, Warner Losh wrote: | : > In message <20001107134101.C5112@fw.wintelcom.net> Alfred Perlstein writes: | : > : Yes, this used to work quite well for some time, I have no idea | : > : who broke it. Maybe you can sprinkle some printfs in the code and | : > : narrow it down a bit? | : > I'll give it a shot. I'm glad to see it is a "should work but is | : > busted" rather than a "depreicated functionality, cope." situtation. | : This seems to be an realy old problem, see PR 765 | : http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=765 | It is a problem that I could have sworn worked before SMPNG. I distinctly remember trying to do the exact same thing and not being able to in 4.0-current vs. 3-stable. (Because it eventually panic'ed the nfs client and cost me a night of work.) Was this a "works sometimes" thing? -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@peorth.iteration.net | keichii@bsdconspiracy.net | | http://peorth.iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001108111059.A74554>