Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:20:22 +0200 From: Anders Nordby <anders@fix.no> To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Cc: iedowse@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, tmm@freebsd.org, alfred@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent RPC changes to -current Message-ID: <20010429202022.A51006@totem.fix.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10104141443150.3178582-100000@harem.imp.ch>; from mb@imp.ch on Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 02:48:36PM %2B0200 References: <20010413145645.P976@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.SGI.4.10.10104141443150.3178582-100000@harem.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > Can you check if this solves the drac problem in CURRENT ? > Does drac work the way it should ? There were some flags > actived in rpcgen, which shouldn't have been. I also modified > your port a bit to use tirpc code and to not include netdir.h > > http://home.teleport.ch/freebsd/rpcgen.diff DRAC works both as it should both with and without this. The only practical difference I could spot is that the rpc.dracd daemon actually detaches (!) when using a rpcgen program with these patches applied to generate its RPC code. Tested in: FreeBSD current.localnet 5.0-20010420-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-20010420-CURRENT #0: Fri Apr 20 15:56:14 GMT 2001 root@usw2.freebsd.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386 (kern.osreldate: 500018) > http://home.teleport.ch/freebsd/drac.diff I'll use this to make a TI_RPC patch for drac in -current then, instead of using rpcgen -b as the pathces I sent in PR ports/26545 do. Thanks. Cheers, -- Anders. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010429202022.A51006>