Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:36:55 +1300 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: too much confusion over kernel building Message-ID: <200101190636.TAA05439@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20010118135857.A11345@grumpy.dyndns.org> References: <200101180744.UAA14563@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>; from dan@langille.org on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:44:22PM %2B1300
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Jan 2001, at 13:58, David Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:44:22PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2001, at 9:41, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > > > > > Who exactly is advocating a full buildworld? The "new" style should not > > > require a full buildworld. If it doesn't work, it's a bug. > > > > The handbook does. Well, it doesn't, but the frequently interpretion is > > just that. And my patch aims to fix that common misinterpretation. > > Amongst other things. > > In all the bulk on this topic I missed the details as to whether > Dan's xeon may have an old buildworld, no buildworld, or up to date > buildworld laying around. My short answer is I don't know. But I suspect I've done a make clean since my last buildworld. I know I've done at least one build world because I'm on 4.2-stable. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ FreshPorts - http://freshports.org/ NZ Broadband - http://unixathome.org/broadband/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101190636.TAA05439>