Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:04:28 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim.Sobolev@portaone.com Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ggate/ggatec Makefile ggatec.c src/sbin/ggate/ggated Makefile ggated.c src/sbin/ggate/shared ggate.c ggate.h Message-ID: <20050710210428.GF46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <42D16238.7010206@portaone.com> References: <200507082128.j68LSQlp096358@repoman.freebsd.org> <42D16238.7010206@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Zll6mx50Q8J7qlLQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:00:24PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: +> Great work, Pawel! +>=20 +> Unrelated question, but I wonder if it would be a good idea to base=20 +> ggate on some industry-standart remote-storage protocol instead (iSCSI= =20 +> being an obvious choice) or at least add a support for it. In ggate you simply forward I/O requests (reads and writes) to userland and back. iSCSI is much more complex and it's below GEOM layer. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --Zll6mx50Q8J7qlLQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC0Y1cForvXbEpPzQRAq3aAJ96sRJ/5uM+K7FB+WqHxBLJvKDzygCff+yh 8bNvnvDM0v0VGKfd4yZ0gI0= =5aYb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zll6mx50Q8J7qlLQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050710210428.GF46538>