Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:50:28 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sio => uart: one port is gone Message-ID: <20080915175028.GD81522@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <48CE8D2D.4020400@icyb.net.ua> References: <48CE59C2.9060307@icyb.net.ua> <BA357CBA-D4F8-44F0-99ED-BDF443DF0AD3@mac.com> <48CE8D2D.4020400@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> wrote: > What is the alternative? > Building it into a kernel? Is this maybe too much of a requirement? > From /sys/i386/conf/NOTES (RELENG_7): > # Note that building ACPI into the kernel is deprecated; the module is > # normally loaded automatically by the loader. I don't really understand why this is deprecated. 99.8% of the systems sold nowadays support ACPI. On AMD64 we enable ACPI by default, because it's impossible to use without ACPI (?) Shouldn't we just enable ACPI by default? --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjOoGQACgkQ52SDGA2eCwURHwCfSLtb5zHrIotyK1qbFei9CA+b oZ4AnRl3taQI0rdgek4P6uXWQ0CFOmuT =7Gyj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080915175028.GD81522>