Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:52:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>
To:        Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
Cc:        Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, papowell@astart.com
Subject:   Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006271344380.318-100000@picnic.mat.net>
In-Reply-To: <200006271608.JAA32987@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:

> > Nope.  Your suggestion is an adjunct to making software changeable, and
> > something like it has already been done for sendmail/postfix, but it
> > doesn't answer the question at all, merely makes changing things
> > easier.  The question is, I remind you, whether or not to remove lpd and
> > replace it with lprng, now HOW to replace it.  We can pretty much figure
> > out how.
> 
> Calm down.

??  I'm not angry, what gave you that idea?

  I was saying that we don't have to replace anything.  Both 
> can live in FreeBSD side-by-side.  The only downside to this is 
> additional work required to maintain both and the additional space 
> required.  Hence the word compromise.

You suggested a method of allowing print to be set more easily, you didn't
suggest that BOTH get kept in FreeBSD's base system.  I think the chance
that we'd have two different versions of print software pretty small; the
anti-bloatists would go berserk.  They'd be right, too, when it would be
pretty simple to just choose.

If we did keep 2, next week we'd be asked to bring in a third.  Heck,
personally, I like apsfilter.  No, adding a second only postpones the
problem, it's not a solution.  Making it easier to choose, maybe, but
choosing 2?  I don't think so.

A solution in the vein you're talking about might put the print tools into
a separately installed piece, one that would allow (require?) a user to
choose their poison (to coin a phrase).  I might get along easier with
that one, but the folks who want to make install simpler the easier,
they'd probably veto it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey            | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD,
chuckr@picnic.mat.net  | electronics, communications, and signal processing.

New Year's Resolution:  I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up
fictitious words in the dictionary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006271344380.318-100000>