Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:04:41 -0500 From: "Patrick Bihan-Faou" <patrick@netzuno.com> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/23264: UPDATE web/squid23 - add vendor patches Message-ID: <0f5901c05e1c$ad1120d0$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> References: <200012041355.eB4Dt1h35700@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: <roam@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 8:55 AM Subject: Re: ports/23264: UPDATE web/squid23 - add vendor patches > Synopsis: UPDATE web/squid23 - add vendor patches > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->peter > Responsible-Changed-By: roam > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 4 05:54:45 PST 2000 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Over to maintainer. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=23264 This is very nice to let the "official" maintainer deal with the appropriate PRs, but Peter has not done anything about squid since last august. There are now 5 PRs in the database that deal with upgrades to squid for various problems (21756, 21761, 20730, 22637 and this one). All of them (except 22637) can be closed if this last one (23264) is commited. I am sure that peter is really busy with other more important things and does not have the time to look over these trivial changes. Maybe he should release the maintainership so that the port can be updated in a timely manner. It is getting annoying to patch the squid port manually to stay up to date. This is not intended as criticism against Peter since I am sure that he has more important things to do. It's just that the patches that are required for squid should probably not be gated for so long, especially when they are so trivial. Patrick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0f5901c05e1c$ad1120d0$040aa8c0>