Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:35:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Joerg Wunsch <joerg@FreeBSD.org> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/print/acroread Makefile pkg-deinstall pkg-install Message-ID: <200503181135.j2IBZ52j089164@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
joerg 2005-03-18 11:35:05 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
print/acroread Makefile pkg-deinstall pkg-install
Log:
Install a symlink for ${LOCALBASE}/bin/acroread, too (in adddition to
acroread7). This resolves the biggest complaint about the new
acroread port. In case an acroread5 port will appear, it then needs
to either be marked as CONFLICT with acroread7, or it should not
install the same symlink, too. This should fix all other ports that
depend on the name "acroread" for the executable.
Depend the port on linux-XFree86-libs, as the most recent versions of
linux_base do no longer contain the X11 libraries. For older versions
of linux_base, this might cause a conflict, but I believe these older
versions are incompatible with the linux-gtk2 prerequisite anyway.
Disable the PPKLite plug-in as we do not want another dependency (on
linux-openldap-libraries where we don't even have a port for). This
is done by chmod 0'ing the plug-in, so anyone interested in it can
easily get it alive again. That way, the annoying popup message at
startup is avoided.
Not resolved: I'd rather leave it to the maintainer to decide whether
and how the installation should go to ${LOCALBASE} instead of
${LINUXBASE}. Technically, I see the description for LINUXBASE in
${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.ports.mk fit here, so this is not strictly a
violation of policy.
Revision Changes Path
1.41 +6 -3 ports/print/acroread/Makefile
1.2 +1 -0 ports/print/acroread/pkg-deinstall
1.2 +1 -0 ports/print/acroread/pkg-install
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503181135.j2IBZ52j089164>